Ethical standards for publication exist to ensure reliable & high-quality scientific research publications, public trust in scientific findings, and that researchers receive credit for their work & ideas.

Varsha research organization follows strict Code of Conduct and aims to adhere to its Best Practice Guidelines.

Authorship and Originality

At organization, we value and prioritize originality in research. All submitted manuscripts must be the original work of the authors, and proper credit should be given to the contributions of others. Plagiarism in any form is strictly prohibited. We encourage authors to appropriately cite and reference the work of others.


Plagiarism is a grave violation of academic and research integrity. our organization  strictly prohibits the submission of plagiarized content. Authors are required to ensure that their submitted work is original and properly attributed to the original sources when using others’ ideas, text, or research findings. We utilize advanced plagiarism detection tools to scrutinize submissions and ensure the authenticity of the content.

Data Integrity and Reproducibility

We emphasize the importance of data integrity and reproducibility. Authors are encouraged to provide accurate and complete data, methodologies, and relevant details to facilitate the reproducibility of their research. Proper documentation of methods and data sources is essential to maintain the credibility of published work.

Data Fabrication & Falsification:

Submitted manuscripts that are found to have either fabricated or falsified experimental results, including the manipulation of images, will incur data fabrication and falsification penalty.

Corrections and Retractions

In cases of errors or inaccuracies in published articles, varsha research organization  is committed to promptly addressing the issue. Authors are encouraged to cooperate with the editorial team to correct any mistakes. In instances of serious ethical violations or misconduct, we follow established guidelines for article retractions.


Reviewers must:

maintain the confidentiality of the review process

immediately alert their journal editor of any real or potential competing interest that could affect the impartiality of their reviewing and decline to review where appropriate

conduct themselves fairly and impartially

We are aware, of course, that academics will come from a particular school of thought and/or may have strong ties to a particular interest. All we ask is that reviewers strive to act fairly. If in doubt about whether a conflict exists, a reviewer should be transparent and seek the views of the journal editor.


Editors Should

keep and support ethical rules for their magazines that are consistent

supervise and act as needed to make sure these rules are followed in a fair and uniform way

make sure that the review method is kept secret.

apply the highest standards of personal integrity in their work as editor of the journal, recognizing and planning for situations where they could have a competing interest or the look of a competing interest

work with writers, readers, and Editorial Board members as needed to make sure they know enough about the ethics and publishing policies of their journals and that the journal’s ethical care is fair, unbiased, and timely.

Peer Reviewer Guidelines

Our peer reviewers play a crucial role in upholding the standards of varsha research organization. We carefully select expert reviewers who provide insightful feedback to authors. Reviewers are expected to maintain confidentiality, declare any conflicts of interest, and evaluate manuscripts objectively. Their expertise ensures the thorough evaluation of submitted work.

 Diversity and Inclusion

we embraces diversity in all forms. We encourage submissions from researchers worldwide, regardless of their background, affiliation, or nationality. Our commitment to inclusion extends to both authors and reviewers, fostering a diverse and global research community.

 Community Engagement

Our organization values the engagement of researchers, academics, and readers within our community. We encourage meaningful discussions, knowledge sharing, and collaborations among members of the organization community. Our interactive platform facilitates constructive dialogue to advance research fields.

Continuous Improvement

We are dedicated to continuous improvement in our publication ethics policies and processes. organization team regularly reviews and updates its policies to align with evolving industry standards and best practices. We welcome feedback from authors, reviewers, and readers to enhance our practices further.

Scroll to Top